AI Talent Competition

• For performance categories
• The video must be uploaded directly through the application form.
• Recommended:
• duration up to 8 minutes;
• good video and sound quality;
• the participant must be clearly visible;
• no speed changes or excessive editing.
• You may use a video previously recorded at a concert or an offline competition.
• For visual arts:
• A high-quality image of the artwork must be uploaded, together with its title and technique.
  
• *Performances with military-patriotic themes are not accepted in our competitions

In a traditional competition, a participant often receives a final score and a prize placement.
For example:

1st Degree Laureate — 92 points.

But the most important question often remains unanswered:

Why exactly 92?

What was done particularly well?

Which elements lowered the score?

What are the participant’s strengths?

What needs to be improved?

What should the participant work on next?

AI Talent Competition uses a fundamentally different approach.

The competition does not award 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Degree Laureate titles and does not use traditional prize placements.

Each participant receives an individual professional evaluation of their current level.

The main purpose of AI Talent Competition is not simply to determine who is better.

The main purpose is to show each participant where they stand today, what their current strengths are, and what they need to do to reach the next level.

After the competition entry is analyzed, the participant receives a personalized AI Jury result.

You receive: an International Electronic Diploma and a certificate with comments on your performance

The diploma includes:

– participant’s name or group name;
– country;
– category;
– age category;
– scores for each professional criterion;
– final score on a 100-point scale;
– unique diploma number.

AI Talent Competition diplomas do not award 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Degree Laureate titles.

The result is based on actual scores for each professional criterion.

Certificate with an analysis of your performance and recommendations

EACH CRITERION IS EVALUATED SEPARATELY

AI Jury does not limit the evaluation to a single overall score.

Each professional criterion for the relevant category is analyzed separately.

For each criterion, the participant receives:

• A separate numerical score.

• What is already a strength of the performance or artwork.
  
• Which weaknesses or limitations affect the result.

Specific recommendations:

• what needs to be improved;
• what to work on;
• which skills to develop;
• which direction to develop further.

As a result, each criterion receives not only a score but also a professional AI Jury comment.

After all criteria have been analyzed, the final score is calculated.

The maximum final score is 100 points.

AI Jury is built on Fiestalonia Milenio’s many years of international competition experience.

• Over nearly two decades, Fiestalonia Milenio has built an extensive database of competition performances, scores, expert comments, age categories, genres, and professional evaluation criteria.
  
• Over the years, hundreds of international experts, teachers, artists, professors, and professional jury members have worked with Fiestalonia projects.
  
• AI Jury analyzes each competition entry according to the criteria of the relevant category and compares its characteristics with the accumulated knowledge base and professional evaluation patterns.
  
• It is a system built on many years of international expert experience.

A human jury may be influenced by:

fatigue;
performance order;
mood;
personal preferences;
limited time for decision-making.

AI Jury applies to every entry:

the same methodology;
the same criteria;
the same evaluation standard.

At the same time, the participant’s age, category, program difficulty, and genre-specific characteristics are taken into account.

The performance itself is evaluated — not the participant’s name, popularity, or previous achievements.

95–100 — Outstanding Competition Level

Virtually no significant weaknesses. A high degree of technical freedom, artistic maturity, individuality, and convincing performance.

90–94 — Very High Level

A professionally convincing performance with only minor weaknesses.

85–89 — High Level

Good preparation and confident performance. Strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses.

80–84 — Good Competition Level

A stable and well-prepared performance, though some technical or artistic limitations remain.

75–79 — Good Basic Level

The participant handles the program successfully, but weaknesses noticeably affect the overall quality.

70–74 — Average Competition Level

There are positive aspects, but technical or artistic inconsistency is significant.

60–69 — Below Average Level

The basic performance skills are present, but numerous weaknesses reduce the overall impact.

50–59 — Weak Competition Level

Noticeable technical problems and insufficient preparation.

0–49 — Significantly Below Competition Level

Significant development of basic technical and artistic skills is required.

If you have already participated in an offline competition, upload the same video to AI Talent Competition.

You will be able to compare the human jury’s evaluation with the AI Jury evaluation.

This allows you to see:
– how close the results are;
– where the scores match;
– where they differ;
– what AI noticed additionally;
– which recommendations you did not receive from a traditional competition.
One performance. Two independent evaluations.

This makes AI Talent Competition not only a competition, but also a tool for obtaining a second professional evaluation.